Innovation

7 posts / 0 new
Last post
tombaileytyne
Innovation
Over the next few days local authorities around the country will be submitting their bids to the Cycle Safety Fund which need to be innovative and tackle difficult / dangerous locations in the road network. What innovations would you most want to see trialled and then copied elsewhere?
sallyhinch

For me, definitely, a Dutch style roundabout with a segregated track and priority for cyclists, and a tight enough geometry that it feels safe to use. 

OR, a fully segregated cycle track buffered by a parking lane so that people can see that parked cars and bike tracks do mix. 

Of course, neither of those is strictly 'innovative' except in the sense that they're considered bizarre novelties in the UK. 

AKA TownMouse

tombaileytyne
I've seen one bid which almost does this from northumberland in that its pairing cycle tracks on humps with zebras on the two quieter arms of the rbt. Priority lost on the major arms but not unknown in Netherlands. Difficulty is that the cycle track needs to be one way following the rbt motor traffic, difficult to achieve when we are used to undisciplined uk shared use paths.
sallyhinch

would be interesting to see if it happens. I get told so often that it would be impossible here (due to different Dutch laws of physics or something...). 

AKA TownMouse

gazza_d

In my neck of the woods, I have found safe, almost (or completely) traffic free routes to local supermarkets, the town centre, hospital etc.

However these routes, like many others are not joined up and seamless, but involve lots of minor junctions, and signing tends to be small direction signs or blue stickers on posts.

The innovation I'd like to see is to change the on-road markings and priority on the junctions etc, to create something similar, but much more ambitious than, a cycling superhighway. The "blue lane" just barrels though, and cycles have priority over everything else. Make the roads access only, and where possible invest in traffic reduction on the roads joining to force motor traffic to stop before proceeding.

Or just dedicate 1 whole lane on urban dual carridgeways to cyclists. Couple this with dutch style junctions. Hmmm

 

 

tombaileytyne
The difficulty with the cycle safety fund is that asks for bids at high risk locations. What a lot of people who use bikes want is a jump in quality on the local utility routes they use to get around, often as a family. Innovation at the big scary junction is a big ask. At least one example of cyclist priority over side roads in each LA would be a good start, not sure many will want to trial it in high profile locations though.
makester

I've just had had an email from my local County Council Transport Officer saying that their understanding is that the announcement "broadens the criteria and adds additional funding to this process." They added that this will hopefully increase the potential for their earlier bid to be successful, and that they will submit a separate bid if "required to".

What was also interesting is the proposed projects they have submitted earlier bids for, with the support of the local CTC and Sustrans, are all rural with no urban schemes proposed. We have our fair share of "crap infrastructure" in our local towns, and evidently they feel there is enough white lines and blue signs in our area, even if motorists don't take notice of them and many cyclists don't feel safe cycling in town.

 


 

makester

Log in or register to post comments