The idea of polling cyclists and non-cyclists about a range of junctions etc in their area is great. The difficulty is in capturing the dynamic feel of a junction. Some junctions I'd happily let my 7 year old navigate alone at 6:00am whereas at 5:00pm I would be wary.
Capturing the dynamic aspects by sampling streetview is difficult and the point of view is an elevated camera on a car, often (where the google car has only gone one direction) from a viewpoint on the wrong side of the road.
Streetview also fails where a cyclists can go off-road along a cycle path, pedestrian area, footbridge, canal tow-path etc. Some features are seen as good cycling infrastructure by town planners but are lamentable to ride due to poor surface, obstacles, narrowness etc.
My view is that the only way to capture the dynamic cylists eye view is to establish a databank of set format videos provided by cyclists with action-cams. I'm not thinking of the expletive laden near miss postings of some you tube afficionados but simple short sequences of junctions, roundabouts etc with a cyclist executing a safe manoevre in different traffic and weather conditions. These could be easily managed in a national database referenced by standard postcode proximity
Isn't it not only physical structure but time and weather? M25 is possibly fine at 4 in the morning :-)
my local streets are good until a boy racer or merc driver turns up!
Isn't it not only physical structure but time and weather? M25 is possibly fine at 4 in the morning :-)
my local streets are good until a boy racer or merc driver turns up!
Isn't it not only physical structure but time and weather? M25 is possibly fine at 4 in the morning :-)
my local streets are good until a boy racer or merc driver turns up!
150 examples of "could cycle" (indeed supposedly designed for that purpose) here:
http://www.warringtoncyclecampaign.co.uk/facility-of-the-month